The previous post translated to spanish then back with Babelfish
I have written before around my esteem of retruécanos, and their capacity to be used like connection between the apparently different subjects. Déjeme to give an example, personal favorite him mine:
I before E=M excepts after C2
This can not look like in the beginning like a retruécano, but the small stick with me.
This retruécano combines rule "I of the spelling before and except after C" with the theory of Einsteins of relativity. No retruécano until now. Then you can be that she makes that the name of Einsteins twice violates the rule of the spelling in only eight letters. To be right, the rule of the spelling is only applied to the English spelling, and only freely. So perhaps it must be "I before and except after C, but absolutely if you are Einstein". Revealed cultural relativity in the retruécano is parallel to the relativity of the speed of the light in E=MC 2de Einsteins. This leads to us (by vicus commodious of the recirculation) to the main one of the uncertainty of Heisenbergs. Our models of the world are right that: models. They say to us not on reality, but on which we are prepared to say on reality. This one is the premise of Korzybski, that puts the idea this way: "the map is not the territory". Intercutting of ideas on language and ideas on the physics looks like to be the product of the fact that our language cannot be able to give a decent accounting of the present models of the physics. Our language programs to think to us about aristotelian terms of "A" or "not of A". In the physics, the approach multi model allows that the physicists mutually accept contradictory theories like the dualidad of particle/wave. To do this is to leave the catagories of "either/or" of the aristotelian logic that are constructed in our language. One cannot say: "a photon is a particle". One can say: "a photon must behave whereas a particle underneath the following laboratory conditions".
See, the retruécanos behave like our friends, under certain conditions of the laboratory.
I before E=M excepts after C2
This can not look like in the beginning like a retruécano, but the small stick with me.
This retruécano combines rule "I of the spelling before and except after C" with the theory of Einsteins of relativity. No retruécano until now. Then you can be that she makes that the name of Einsteins twice violates the rule of the spelling in only eight letters. To be right, the rule of the spelling is only applied to the English spelling, and only freely. So perhaps it must be "I before and except after C, but absolutely if you are Einstein". Revealed cultural relativity in the retruécano is parallel to the relativity of the speed of the light in E=MC 2de Einsteins. This leads to us (by vicus commodious of the recirculation) to the main one of the uncertainty of Heisenbergs. Our models of the world are right that: models. They say to us not on reality, but on which we are prepared to say on reality. This one is the premise of Korzybski, that puts the idea this way: "the map is not the territory". Intercutting of ideas on language and ideas on the physics looks like to be the product of the fact that our language cannot be able to give a decent accounting of the present models of the physics. Our language programs to think to us about aristotelian terms of "A" or "not of A". In the physics, the approach multi model allows that the physicists mutually accept contradictory theories like the dualidad of particle/wave. To do this is to leave the catagories of "either/or" of the aristotelian logic that are constructed in our language. One cannot say: "a photon is a particle". One can say: "a photon must behave whereas a particle underneath the following laboratory conditions".
See, the retruécanos behave like our friends, under certain conditions of the laboratory.
posted by Reverend Kevin Warner at 1:44 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home